Valken darf die PSP nicht sponsorn

[icp-ms]

Valken is saying that they paid to be a sponsor of the PSP and their check was returned.

The PSP isn't letting them be a sponsor, even if they paid.


EDIT: Valken confirmed it.

[twannek]

*w00t* .... :rock:

[FH-MH]

Style gewinnt!

[Krashok]

normal wenn man immer nur das zeug der anderen kopiert, dass man dann irgendwann nicht mehr mitspielen darf ^^

[AliasRL]

hahaha... jetzt liebe PSP zählt aber in keinem Fall mehr das Argument "Aus KOSTENgründen muss ... eingespart werden"

Ich will dieses Jahr zu jedem Event einen Webcast haben :mnt:

Scheiss egal wie uncool Valken ist. Wichtig ist doch, dass Geld in den Zirkus fliesst und den Spieler zugute kommt. :denk:

[Shihayazad]

Ach wenn Valken gerne den Style anderer modifiziert ändert das nichts daran das die m.M. nach ein ernstzunehmender Mitbewerber auf dem PB-Markt sind.

Warum sollten die dann nicht auch Sposoring machen dürfen, verstehe die Logik nicht - wie vorher schon gepostet: Hauptsache Geld kommt rein...

Idee: Es sei denn ein anderer Sponsor mit mehr Kohle hat sich quergestellt wenn Valken mitmacht ^^

[Krashok]

valken kopiert bisschen mehr als nur style

[AliasRL]

sponsort valken denn die NPPL? :denk: :mnt:

[Shihayazad]

@KrashoK: Hehe hast Recht, wollte es "diplomatisch" ausdrücken...

[AlphaKevin]

geile nummer..


Man sagt ja selbst schlechte Nachrichten sind gute Werbung aber das darf in diesem Fall bezweifelt werden.. :lool:

[Jens]

ich dachte valken ist das Proto des Empire...

[Juggernout]

There’s a limit to the number of cases sold at each event. I’m going to use entirely fictitious numbers here so don’t read too deeply into this but I think this may help you understand why a decision like this is made if it’s about competition.

Let’s say that 5000 cases of paint sell at every PSP event, independent of the number of paint vendors in attendance. I obviously do not have sales data from each vendor so again, we’re going to use fictitious numbers to explore this concept. It’s more or less the equivalent of carrying capacity. Let’s say that hypothetically speaking, paint sales are divided evenly by each vendor.

5000 cases / 1 vendor = 5000 cases sold per vendor
5000 cases / 2 vendors = 2500 cases sold per vendor
5000 cases / 3 vendors = 1667 cases sold per vendor
5000 cases / 4 vendors = 1250 cases sold per vendor

Given that companies have to pay $____ to the PSP to earn a spot on the paint vendor list, they will need to sell X cases each in order to break even on their investment. If the difference between, for example… 2 and 3 vendors (nearly 900 cases each) is the difference between breaking even and losing money for each vendor, the PSP will be expected to draw the line at 2 vendors in order to retain a viable sales model. Otherwise, they could face one or more vendors pulling out and face a potentially fatal paint situation. If the carrying capacity of the PSP market is 2 paint vendors and they put 3 at every event, problems arise.

[WhiteNinja]

There’s a limit to the number of cases sold at each event. I’m going to use entirely fictitious numbers here so don’t read too deeply into this but I think this may help you understand why a decision like this is made if it’s about competition.

Let’s say that 5000 cases of paint sell at every PSP event, independent of the number of paint vendors in attendance. I obviously do not have sales data from each vendor so again, we’re going to use fictitious numbers to explore this concept. It’s more or less the equivalent of carrying capacity. Let’s say that hypothetically speaking, paint sales are divided evenly by each vendor.

5000 cases / 1 vendor = 5000 cases sold per vendor
5000 cases / 2 vendors = 2500 cases sold per vendor
5000 cases / 3 vendors = 1667 cases sold per vendor
5000 cases / 4 vendors = 1250 cases sold per vendor

Given that companies have to pay $____ to the PSP to earn a spot on the paint vendor list, they will need to sell X cases each in order to break even on their investment. If the difference between, for example… 2 and 3 vendors (nearly 900 cases each) is the difference between breaking even and losing money for each vendor, the PSP will be expected to draw the line at 2 vendors in order to retain a viable sales model. Otherwise, they could face one or more vendors pulling out and face a potentially fatal paint situation. If the carrying capacity of the PSP market is 2 paint vendors and they put 3 at every event, problems arise.

http://www.propaintball.com/2012/02/psp ... nsorships/

genau!.. da steht noch bisschen mehr ;-)

[icp-ms]

Misinformation is circulating that paintball manufacture Valken Sports was “shut out of the PSP”. As typical on ProPaintball, we immediately reached out to Lane Wright of PSP Events. Being the COO of the PSP, Lane was able to cut through the misinformation and set the record straight.



Here are the facts;

■In addition to being an exhibitor, Valken and DYE Precision both expressed interest in being a paintball sponsor of the PSP for the 2012 season.
■After a period of review, both requests to be a paintball sponsor were denied. According to Lane, this decision was reached with the intent of preventing a race to the bottom (see below) and returning paint vendors were given first considerations. (Neither DYE nor Valken supported the league as a paint vendor in 2011)
■Both Valken & DYE Precision are invited to exhibit their products at events – just as they have done in the past. However, they can’t sell paint.
■Lane mentioned that the PSP tried having several paintball vendors at events. However, in their experience, too many paint vendors selling inventory to a limited audience created a lose-lose for everyone. It created a race to the bottom environment that depressed prices in the short term and created a situation where the paintball manufactures lose interest and question their investments in competitive paintball.

[poTTo]

ich dachte valken ist das Proto des Empire...

Genauso dachte ich bisher aber auch

[tiny23]

da habt ihr falsch gedackt. Das war früher Invert!

[Farbenfroh]

ich dachte valken ist das Proto des Empire...

Genauso dachte ich bisher aber auch

Valken war bevor es Paintballsachen hergestellt hat,ein reiner Extremsport-Klamotten Hersteller.

[Shihayazad]

Ach söööö... Das wusst ich auch noch nicht - naja gut man sieht halt zu das man den Absatzmarkt erweitert wo´s geht wa?

[jeff.chandler]

I just confirmed it again with one of the owners of the NPPL, Valken is the only paint company currently set up to sell paint at the Huntington Beach NPPL.

What does this mean for the teams that have to shoot other brands? Will they be allowed to bring paint?

Or do you guys think that GI/Procaps or KEE will end up attending?

Quelle: pbnation


das ist vielleicht der grund, warum valken keine paint auf der psp verkaufen darf